Website / Web design & motionRELEASED v1.0.0

Motion Quality Review

Reproducible browser motion review and comparison report. Adapted from a pinned OpenDesign source with a standalone brief workflow, local assets, retained licensing and actual generated evidence.

A little less setup

Make this part of your toolkit.

Give your agent this prompt. You’ll approve access in your browser before it installs a Skill.

Read https://skilly.uk/install/skills/motion-quality-review.md and follow the instructions to install this Skill for my agent.
Installation guide

REAL SAMPLE / RELEASED PACKAGE

RELEASED v1.0.0

A closer look at the actual output.

Actual output from the included structured brief. Sample brands and stories are fictional; the review report uses intentionally faulty and fixed local fixtures.

THE COMPLETE TEMPLATE

Try it. Make yourself at home.

Live preview

Scroll inside, explore the pages, and try the controls. Choose Open for downloads, printing, or external links.

Open
Loading the live preview…

1440 × 900 canvas · scaled evenly to fitUse the preview’s own scroll and keyboard controls.

LIVE PREVIEW

Motion Quality Review

Open sample in a new tab

Inside this template

3 sections
  1. A rotation should not move the whole page.
  2. faulty.html
  3. What this review can say.

A GUIDED LOOK

The whole story, in motion.

15 sec

A screen recording of this working demo, covering 3 sections. This is a guided preview, not a video exported by the Skill.

In this walkthrough
  1. A rotation should not move the whole page.
  2. faulty.html
  3. What this review can say.
Tested runtime
Node.js 24.19.0 · macOS arm64 · Chrome 154
Pinned dependency
playwright-core 1.63.0 · Apache-2.0
Checks completed
Normal and edge briefs, generator safety, narrow/desktop document width, keyboard and motion behavior. See bundled evidence for per-package scope.

Actual generated output, browser checks and independent Codex workflow.

Explicit Codex workflow tested with a new brief. Trusted local projects only: HTTP/WS filtering and SW blocking are not an OS network sandbox. Local Chromium checks are not real-device or full accessibility certification.

From a good brief to a better result.

Reproducible browser motion review and comparison report. Adapted from a pinned OpenDesign source with a standalone brief workflow, local assets, retained licensing and actual generated evidence. The published package has its own version, tested environments, and included outputs listed alongside this overview. Any earlier draft samples below retain their original verification scope.

What you bring

  • Local HTML baseline and optional repaired comparison
  • Viewport samples and the interaction to reproduce

What you’ll make

  • Measured HTML and JSON motion reports
  • Baseline/comparison screenshots and regression fixtures
  • MIT source review standards and scoped limitations

The intended workflow

  1. Shape the task-specific brief
  2. Generate into a new folder
  3. Review the measured behavior and final presentation