Process notebook6 nodes / 6 connections

From a question to a useful answer.

An editorial review loop. Follow the main path, branch for missing evidence, then return with a clearer claim.

010203040506
01 / brief

Frame the question

Write the decision this work should make easier.

02 / evidence

Collect the evidence

Record the source, date, and relevant limitations.

03 / draft

Make a first draft

Separate observed facts from your interpretation.

04 / gaps

Close the gaps

Find missing context or narrow the scope.

05 / review

Invite a review

Ask where the logic becomes difficult to follow.

06 / publish

Share the result

Keep the sources and the revision history nearby.

  1. 01brief → evidence
    Begin
  2. 02evidence → draft
    Enough evidence
  3. 03evidence → gaps
    Missing context
  4. 04gaps → evidence
    Return
  5. 05draft → review
    Review
  6. 06review → publish
    Ready
Read the node and connection list
  1. brief — Frame the question: Write the decision this work should make easier.
  2. evidence — Collect the evidence: Record the source, date, and relevant limitations.
  3. draft — Make a first draft: Separate observed facts from your interpretation.
  4. gaps — Close the gaps: Find missing context or narrow the scope.
  5. review — Invite a review: Ask where the logic becomes difficult to follow.
  6. publish — Share the result: Keep the sources and the revision history nearby.
  • brief → evidence · Begin
  • evidence → draft · Enough evidence
  • evidence → gaps · Missing context
  • gaps → evidence · Return
  • draft → review · Review
  • review → publish · Ready